The Purpose Driven Life: Day 5

I’m not doing a very good job of keeping up with my daily posts!

Okay, in day 5, Warren asserts that how we see life is a choice, and that that choice affects our behavior – how we choose to live.  He asks us to “see life from God’s view” and says the bible offers 3 metaphors for life:  it is a test, it is a trust, and it is a temporary assignment.

I agree that how we see life is a choice and that it affects how we choose to live.  I wrote about this here.

I’m struggling with what seems to me to be circular logic and contradictory statements regarding “God’s” relationship to man according to Warren.  How can life be a test if “God” knows all, makes no mistakes, and relies on sin to accomplish his plan, as Warren asserts in day 2?  I don’t see how predetermination and free will can coexist.

Assuming free will does exist, I don’t find the metaphor of life as a test especially helpful.  Tests are measuring devices, they are not teaching or learning devices – if all of life is one big evaluation, when are we ever supposed to learn what we’re being evaluated on?  Aside from that, viewing life as a test would also seem to promote self-judgment and shame every time you “got the answer wrong,” not to mention fear and anxiety over the prospect of going to hell for eternity as a result.

I find more meaning in viewing life’s events as growth opportunities.  Whereas a test measures what you learned, a growth opportunity is about new learning.  Tests tell you whether you’re “good” or “bad.”  Growth opportunities offer hope in that each one is another chance for you to heal the divide between your ego and your soul, between that in you which is not Good and that in you which is.  If you find yourself in the same unpleasant situation over and over again, recognize that this is merely You – Being, Love, God, Awareness, True Self – providing you – ego, false self – yet another opportunity to discover that in you which is not Good so you can let it go (I wrote about my own recurring struggle with dishonesty, control, and external validation seeking here).

Warren asserts that life is a trust – that “God” has entrusted man with the care of “His” creation.  While I do not agree with the Christian dogma in Warren’s words, I know the sentiment to be true experientially.  One need look no further than how it feels to help a person or an animal in need – offering genuine help in the face of genuine need – versus ignoring them to know that we are meant to take care of one another and of the planet.

This is not about morals – “right” vs. “wrong.”  This is about healing the internal divide – living according to your deepest values and desires.  Some among you may say you have no deep and abiding desire to care for others, or animals, or the planet, so the assertion that life is a trust is not true for you.  That’s okay.  Only you know the contents of your soul.  No one else can dictate your soul’s path.

When Warren says that life is a temporary assignment, he talks about it as if life were a job and “God” were our boss.  He draws on bible verses to assert that, when we die, “God” will evaluate how well we took care of that with which He trusted us, will give us an attaboy for a job well done, will give us a promotion with more fulfilling work and greater responsibility, and will honor us with a celebration.

Meh.  Again, focusing on the future goes against every spiritual tradition, including Christianity (Jesus said “Worry not for tomorrow…).  We find our purpose here and now, not there and then.  Focusing more on the reward you expect to get in the future than on whether your work today is fulfilling is a fast track to a hellish life.

TL;DR:  No tl;dr for virtual book club posts.

The Opposite of Addiction is Connection

This is an excellent Ted Talk on addiction – what causes it and how to most effectively treat it.  While the speaker focuses on drug addiction, he draws important parallels to other addictions, such as technology, food, sex, and money.

Johann Hari – Everything you think you know about addiction is wrong.

It compels one to consider how connected one feels, and whether a lack of connection is driving addictive, unhealthy, and unsatisfying behavior in one’s life.

The Purpose Driven Life: Day 4

I got busy in other pursuits yesterday and did not make time for my daily The Purpose Driven Life post, so I’m a day behind.

Day 4 of The Purpose Driven Life is another chapter whose subject is a matter of personal belief and is not experientially knowable – the idea that we are made for eternity, that our lives do not end at death.  This chapter is also heavy on religious dogma – we get only this one life, this life is merely a dry run for our eternal life, and if we get it wrong we’re going to hell for eternity.

There were things about this chapter I liked and agreed with and things I didn’t.  But, mostly, I found the notion of eternity irrelevant to the question of “what on earth am I here for?” posed on the book’s cover.  Far too often, the notion of eternity is used to instill fear in people – eternity’s a long time, so you better not screw it up.  There’s an element of fearmongering in Warren’ words, as well.  But, Jesus also said “Therefore do not worry about tomorrow, for tomorrow will worry about itself.  Each day has enough trouble of its own.”  Jesus was not a fearmonger.

Jesus’ words are echoed by Ram Dass’ “Be here now,” by Eckhart Tolle’s assertion that nothing ever happens outside the present moment, by the saying “yesterday is history, tomorrow is a mystery, but today is a gift – that’s why it’s called the present,” and by many other spiritual teachers and words of wisdom I cannot recall or have not yet come to know.  Whether my life is eternal or whether it is snuffed out of existence tomorrow is irrelevant to this moment.  What matters in this moment is that my life is aligned with my deepest, most cherished values and desires.  An eternity spent living a life like that would be heaven indeed.

TL;DR:  No tl;dr for virtual book club posts.

 

You Are What You Attract?

The idea that you are what you attract is pretty standard spiritual fare. Perhaps “you are what you attract” is not the most accurate way of saying it, but the idea is that, whatever you’ve got going on in your life, everything you have in your life, you attracted to yourself out of your own desire. For example, I wrote yesterday that I grew up learning that love meant proving myself, and so I have attracted – and been attracted to – distrusting, disapproving people to whom I felt the need to prove myself.  I thought I could fix them.

What I didn’t realize then, but do now, is that I was exactly like them.  I didn’t trust the veracity of their love because I didn’t trust that I was lovable.  And inherent in trying to fix another person is disapproval of them.  Saying that I didn’t trust I was lovable is saying that I disapproved of myself, and I attracted people who validated my beliefs with the mistrust and disapproval I so desired.

In trying to fix them, I was really trying to fix myself.

A never-ending source of pain and shame for me in my life is that I attract men who want to use me to gratify their sexual desires.  I attract these kinds of men almost exclusively, or perhaps they are the only ones who ever bother to make their romantic intentions known.  This happened to me again today and it was quite the black mark on my day.  Objectively, it was a nothing of an event, yet it made me feel horrible about myself and the world.

I was sitting on the metro looking every bit the foreigner and doing myself no favors in blending in by reading a book, in English, of course, from my Kindle.  I noticed the man sitting next to me glance over at me a couple times before turning to ask me a question while holding up his phone to show me what looked like a text exchange he was having.  I didn’t understand what he was asking and told him I don’t speak Portuguese.  Most people just turn away from me at this point, but he seemed very interested in talking to this foreigner.  We managed to stumble through a few pleasantries and superficial questions about where we’re from, travel, etc. when he asked me for my phone number.

I was taken aback.  I was enjoying the conversation and the opportunity to use and grow my Portuguese, and I enjoyed what seemed like an honest interest in me as a human being on his behalf, but the idea that this superficial conversation should extend beyond this subway ride was incomprehensible to me.  Clearly, we can’t communicate with one another.  And, while he may be enjoying listening to me butcher his language, we’ve pretty much already exhausted our conversation material, so why on earth would he want my phone number?  This was the instantaneous thought in my head, and of course the answer was obvious before I’d even formed the question in my mind.

I was paralyzed inside.  We had established no connection, nothing that compelled me to pursue this “relationship” beyond the metro ride.  Him trying to do exactly that – to pursue the “relationship” further without having first established the connection necessary to make doing so worthwhile – felt like a betrayal to me.  We’re sitting on the metro, surrounded by people, we’re the only two people talking, and he basically says “oh, you’re from the U.S?  I’m going to Orlando in October.  Do you have What’sApp?  Give me your phone number.”  It was an awkward situation and I felt trapped – saying no would make the situation even more awkward and uncomfortable for the untold number of minutes that would pass before one of us exited.

Now, intellectually, I realize this is not a big deal.  But, emotionally, it was a disaster.  Many women in this same situation would simply say “no” with no feelings of shame or guilt or feeling compelled to explain their “no.”  I felt very much in the spotlight, given the circumstances, and felt like he’d laid a trap for me.  All that shame and guilt I wrote about yesterday boiled up and I suddenly felt under extreme pressure.  I did not want to give him my phone number – my internal guidance system was very clear about this.  And yet, I felt I couldn’t say no – some combination of societal pressure to be acquiescent, wanting to avoid that awkward metro ride (I wrote about this here when I wrote about lying), and feeling as though I must have done something wrong to bring this on myself prevented me from doing so.

There is an intense resistance inside me when these things happen.  “This isn’t happening,” I think.  I don’t want to believe that this person is so blatantly trying to use me; I don’t want to see them as a user.  And because I refuse to accept the  reality of the situation, I cannot respond appropriately to it.

I tried to give a soft no.  “You want my phone number?”  I asked with surprise.  Then, laughing and with a look of confusion on my face, added “why?”  I couldn’t say all the things I wanted to say:  “We can’t talk to each other – why do you want my number?” “We don’t live in the same country – why do you want my number?”  My response was meant to gently communicate my disinterest and to point out that there’s no good reason for him to be asking for my phone number, but it probably just looked like flirting to him.  “So we can go get food in Ipanema,” he said.

Deal done.  I put my number in his phone.  As if to highlight his error in trying to turn the situation into something it wasn’t and my error in allowing it to happen instead of calling it out by its name, we then sat in awkward silence for a minute or two before I was finally able to conceive of another question to ask him.  He got off the metro before I did and we parted with the traditional kisses on each cheek, except most people’s are short air kisses, whereas his were full and lingering.

I was really disgusted by both he and I.  There was no compassion or empathy or lovingkindness in my immediate reflections on this – there was only hatred of him for “doing this to me” and of myself for letting it happen yet again.  I made him out to be “bad” and myself to be shameful – perhaps making him out to be bad is me trying to foist my shame onto him.

I am tortured by the questions “why does this keep happening to me?” and “why can’t I calmly and kindly say ‘no’ – why do I have to make it into an issue?”  My shame causes me to feel inordinately responsible for the situation and, therefore, for his feelings.  Instead of being honest and saying “no,” I am dishonest and go along with the sham to avoid feeling guilty about hurting his pride.

If you are what you attract, then I attract users so I can use them in return.  And how might I use someone like him in return?  For validation and approval – pleasing a user is as easy as giving them what they want.  Boom!  Validated…  There’s probably also an element of being a victim that appeals to me – I like being in the role of victim because I enjoy my own self pity.  The answer to the question “why does this keep happening to me?” is “because I keep wanting it.”  I’m still searching externally for the love and approval my mother didn’t provide me instead of finding it in myself.  In doing so, I unconsciously invite users into my life in misguided attempts to heal that festering old wound.

Acknowledging – shining the light of awareness on – our flaws and shortcomings robs them of their power.  Perhaps my insights here will help me to better see just what it is I’m attracting to myself and to respond to the situation – and to myself and others – with more patience, kindness, and compassion.

TL;DR:  Got hit on in the metro, suffered spiritual breakdown a result.

The Purpose Drive Life: Day 3

In chapter 3, Warren posits the question:  “What drives your life?”

He offers 5 common destructive drivers of behavior and decision making:  guilt, resentment and anger, fear, materialism, and approval seeking.

I have first-hand knowledge of all of these drives, and still find them vying for power in my mind.  I must remain vigilant for signs of their influence in my thoughts or risk falling yet again into their toxic traps.  I know how destructive these drives can be, how emotionally torturous…  I know how they can make you feel mad, hollow, hopeless and out of control.

Guilt and shame*:  There’s feeling bad about having done something wrong (guilt), and there’s shame you carry around as an aspect of your being.  The first is normal and healthy, and you can easily do away with it, depending on the degree of the wrongdoing, by fessing up to your mistake and honestly changing your behavior.  But carrying around shame as an aspect of your being is another thing entirely.

Growing up, my mother was an abusive alcoholic and drug addict.  I lived with her until I was 14, so it was in this environment that I spent my formative years, learned what “love” looked like, and first developed an identity.  My mother’s abuse entailed her taking her negative emotions out on me and blaming me for her emotional state.  I was her scapegoat.  Mom was mad, I was to blame.  To add to the dysfunction, her drug use would take her to wild extremes of carefree abandon and despondent anger, so that the same behavior might elicit in her laughter and elation one day, and rage and abusive name-calling the next.  I came to understand that I was “bad” when I elicited my mother’s abusive rage, but because her rage was inconsistent and irrational, what constituted “being bad” was never very clear.  The result is that I grew up with shame as fundamental aspect of my personality and a driver of my behavior.

Because I felt shame, I felt responsible for others’ feelings and pandered to them, which essentially means I tried to control their emotional states through manipulation.  This was unconscious, of course, and had you pointed this out to me, I would have reacted in indignant rage and immediately proclaimed my innocence, because…

Feeling shame also made me feel extremely defensive.  Even the smallest hint of an accusation would trigger my defensiveness.  This made it easy enough for others to control me because I was compelled to prove my innocence of whatever I had been accused – as long as they remained doubtful (which they always did) of my innocence, I was under their control.

Feeling shame gave me a skewed sense of what was okay in dealing with others and what wasn’t.  Disagreeing wasn’t okay.  It’s not that I had a problem with conflict, because I didn’t.  People who’ve known me long enough know that I can be a serious bitch.  I’ve been called stubborn, black and white, and idealistic by those who have had the experience of arguing heatedly with me.  What I had a problem with was not finding a solution that was agreeable to all.  This gave people another way to control me and was a real problem for me at work because, while I was always trying to bridge disagreements, others were moving right past the disagreement as if it didn’t exist and pursuing the path that I was not on board with.  This left me feeling small, disrespected, angry and resentful and never helped me accomplish a single thing.

And, because I felt shame, anything that was wrong was my fault and my responsibility to fix.  I butted my nose in where I shouldn’t have and I assumed responsibility for others’ bad behavior in my relationships.  This made the relationships uneven and, thus, unstable.

I know what you’re thinking and, yes, guys – I am single and available!

Anger and resentment:  I’ve been very angry most of my life, something I picked up from both my parents.  I wrote a little bit about my anger with regards to driving here.  In my anger, I have vilified others and been terribly unkind not only to people I didn’t especially like or care for (not that that’s okay), but to friends and loved ones as well.  I’ve both blown up in anger at people in righteous indignation and turned my anger inward to feed my intense feelings of shame and unworthiness.

Having grown up in an environment where this was the norm, I thought my anger and unkind expressions of it were normal.  I thought that was what arguing looked like.  I was into my 30’s before I even began to suspect that perhaps my anger was a problem – my problem, and not the problem of those who provoked it.

Fear:  A chronic fear of destitution has plagued me my entire adult life and contributed to much of my misery.  I grew up poor, and I associated being poor with being a failure.  My mother and I got evicted from our apartment when I was 13.  When I was 17 and a senior in high school, I sometimes had to buy food and pay bills with the money from my part-time, minimum wage job working at a hot-dog stand in the mall (no, not that hot-dog stand), not to mention buying my own yearbook, prom dress, etc.  I was so afraid of turning out poor like my parents – of being seen as a failure – that I joined the army specifically to get away from that.  As an adult, I have made choices around education, accepting jobs, keeping jobs, and relationships based on my fear of becoming destitute and homeless.

I also have a chronic fear of other people – mostly a low level suspicion that they’re trying to use me for something or that they’re judging me, but sometimes more extreme.  My mother’s drug and alcohol abuse led her to lie, cheat, and steal, even to and from her own daughter.  My mother was a tortured soul and I suspect she thought she might find salvation in having a child – that a child might make her get her shit together, feel needed and important, something.  So, she was using me even before I was conceived.  As a child, she used me for more tangible things:  as a dumping ground for all of her shame, as a tool to elicit sympathy – and money – from others, and as a source of money myself by stealing money from me, stealing money from my friends, and by pawning my few possessions of value.  So, I grew up being used to being used, and, perhaps because of this, I attracted other users to me even from a very young age.  Being poor meant taking the Long Beach city and LA County buses to school, where I attracted much unwanted attention from men 20, 30, 40 years older than me who felt inconceivably entitled to my time, attention and body.  Their assumption of ownership over me was mind-boggling in its delusion, and they were mortally offended by my lack of appreciation of, and reciprocation for, their affections.  I grew up being used, I grew to expect that others would try to use me, and I simultaneously sought that in my relationships (because that’s what love was to me, after all) and guarded vigilantly against it.  Intimacy cannot grow in this environment, and even when in romantic relationships I have felt lonely and alone since adolescence.

I have also feared love.  I have feared that I am not worthy of love, I have feared that love is not meant for me, and so I have simultaneously pursued what I thought was love while watching for its inevitable failure and strangling the life from any young shoots of love in the process.

Materialism:  Materialism is the one driver listed here that perhaps has not had much influence in my life.  I’ve bought nice things, and I’ve enjoyed shopping sprees, but I’ve not found much identity in these things.  My fear of destitution far exceeded my love of material possessions and kept any bent toward “shopping therapy” to a financially responsible minimum.

Approval-seeking:  Growing up learning that I was responsible for others’ emotional states translated directly into approval-seeking in all areas of my life.  Because my identity was defined by how I “made others feel,” I looked to others to tell me whether I was right, wrong, good, bad, liked, worthy, etc.  In interpersonal relationships, as a general rule, the more confident a person seemed and the less they seemed to care what others thought of them – especially if they didn’t seem to care what I thought of them – the more influence they had over me, the more needy I was for their consideration, approval, and favor.

*I would like to make one comment on guilt and shame.  Guilt and shame are related, and Warren uses them somewhat interchangeably here, but they are not the same thing.  You experience guilt when you do something “wrong” – that is to say, when you go against yourself.  I’m not talking morals here, I’m talking about whether your behavior accords with your deepest beliefs and values.  When it does, it doesn’t matter whether anyone else says your behavior is wrong, you won’t feel guilty.  When it does not, it doesn’t matter how normal or acceptable your behavior is to society, you will still feel guilty.

Shame, on the other hand, is not a result of doing bad, but but of feeling bad or inadequate at our core.   Some believe (and I agree) that shame does not come from ourselves, but is a burden foisted upon us by another.  The idea is that one must be made to feel bad or inadequate in essence, that this feeling does not spontaneously emerge of its own accord.  Your shame is not your shame – it is shame that was given you by someone else and which you now carry around as your own.

Most of our shame is passed on to us by our families, especially our parents, but also by our societies and cultures.  Shame is also something we pretend doesn’t exist because none of us want to feel shame or for others to see us as shameful (which we think they would if we admitted to feeling shame).  So, how do we manage our shame if we refuse to acknowledge its existence?  We make other people responsible for it.  If we look at my example with my mother, my mother’s behavior was clearly driven by her own shame.  She felt ashamed of who she was, so she numbed her pain with drugs and alcohol.  She felt ashamed of her drug and alcohol abuse, but admitting to herself her own responsibility in the matter was too painful for her to bear, and so she made me responsible instead.  In this way, she avoided dealing with her shame and passed it on to me, and I began to carry it around as if it was my own.

But, if my shame is not mine but my mother’s which I now carry around, then where did my mother’s shame come from?  Why, from her own parents, society and culture.  I bring this up because I want to make it clear that I do not write about my mother here to vilify or shame her or make her out to be a bad person or to curry your sympathy on account of her.  I write about my mother to tell my story.  I can hardly write about the shame I carry around without also sharing where it came from.  I do not blame or hate my mother for her behavior, for just as the shame I have carried around is not mine, neither is it hers.  Neither is it her parents’, neither is it theirs’…  Knowing that my mother was burdened by a shame that was not hers allows me to have more compassion toward her and to empathize with her predicament.  She dealt with it the best way she knew how and the way she was taught in her own family – by seeking escape in worldly things.  I can hardly criticize her for this for I did the same thing – she sought escape in alcohol, drugs, anger and blame, while I sought escape in education, money, anger, blame, and approval-seeking.

This is how abuse is passed down from generation to generation.  I have a dear friend who was sexually abused by both her father and her older brother from a very young age.  In discussing this with her once, I mentioned that her father must have abused her brother as well – that sexual abuse is not a normal behavior and must be learned, that he must have learned it from her father.  Her father expressed his shame, and foisted it onto his children, by sexually abusing them (likely he was the victim of sexual abuse himself).  And her brother learned to abuse her in the same fashion.  This is an extreme example of “growing up to be exactly like your father/mother,” but you can see the point I’m making – we learn to abuse others because we are ourselves abused.  And the cause of all of this is shame.

Unless you are extremely pure and accepting of all aspects of yourself, we all carry around some amount of shame and we all deal with it by trying to escape it and/or foisting it onto others.  Instead of vilifying those who have foisted their shame on us and abused us, let’s instead have compassion for them that they were once victims of the same crime and focus our attention on the ways in which we perpetrate the same crime against others.  We can each do more to end the cycle of shame and abuse by focusing on our own perpetrations, however minor they may seem, than by judging against others for theirs.

TL;DR:  No tl;dr for virtual book club posts.

The Purpose Driven Life: Day 2

In Day 2 of The Purpose Driven Life, we explore the concept that:  I am not an accident; I was created by “God” for a purpose; “He” purposefully selected every aspect of my being, including predetermining my parents, my nationality, my appearance, the dates and times of my birth and death – everything – to serve the unique purpose “He” has in store for me.

I wrote in The Purpose Driven Life:  Day 1 that the purpose of exploring this book here is to discuss whether we know in our hearts the lessons put forth by the author to be true based on our experience rather than simply believing them to be true in our minds.  I’m not sure that applies to this particular lesson as it seems to me to be inherently faith-based rather than experientially knowable.  Perhaps at the end of our lives we can say from experience whether “God” created us for a purpose.

As I read the chapter, I found myself needing to remember my own words about finding personal meaning in the Christian vocabulary used by the author.  I found myself resisting many of the concepts in this chapter based on the theology of the author and the emphasis on the separation between “God” and man.  I really had to step away from the book so that I could return to it with fresh eyes and an ability to hear what the author is trying to communicate.

The only way this chapter makes sense to me is if the distinction between “God” and man is erased; if we recognize that there is but One Being – “Good” – and everything that exists in the universe – everything you can see, touch, taste, smell and hear; every person you meet; everything you encounter in life – is merely an expression of Good.  I think this is the true meaning behind the Holy Trinity – “God” is Being, man is the manifestation of “God”/Being in physical form, and the Holy Spirit is like a finger on the body of Being, a wave in the ocean of Being, a solar flare in the sun of Being that inhabits the physical form of man.  In his life, Christ discouraged others in their attempts to deify him, instead trying to open his disciples’ eyes to their own Godliness within.  Deepak Chopra says that we are all “Gods and Goddesses in embryo.”  Khalil Gibran says “Like a procession you walk together towards your god-self.  You are the way and wayfarers.”  In other words, we didn’t just come from “God,” we are “God” made manifest in the physical world.

Warren says “‘God is love’…  God didn’t need to create you.  He wasn’t lonely.  But he wanted to make you in order to express his love.”  If “God” is truly separate from man, then I’m left wondering what creating man had to do with expressing “God’s” love.  Of what, exactly, was “He” expressing “His” love when “He” created man?  And to whom?  The purpose is still lost on me.  I’m also left wondering, if “God” created man to express “His” love, then why did “He” also create suffering?  Christians might  respond that “God” didn’t create suffering, that Adam and Eve brought suffering on the world by disobeying “God” and eating of the fruit of the tree of knowledge.  However, Warren asserts that “Many children are unplanned by their parents, but they are not unplanned by God.  God’s purpose took into account human error, and even sin.”  By that account, “God” knew Adam and Eve would eat the apple before “He” even created them because “He” created them – and the snake – for that purpose.  It all becomes very circular to me as long as “God” and man are separate entities.

But, if we accept that we are Good, and that everything that exists in the world is Good, then saying that Good made creation to “express [It’s] love” is simply to say that creation is Good expressing Itself.  Good didn’t make the world, Good is the world.  You are Good, and I am also Good, and that’s really all there is to say.  What does it mean to ask why Good created Itself?  It is enough to know that Good is and that, as a member of the body of Good, by definition you are not an accident.

TL;DR:  No tl;dr for virtual book club posts.

The Purpose Driven Life: Day 1

Friends!  In this post from June 23, a friend and former colleague, Brett, recommended that I read The Purpose Driven Life by Rick Warren, calling it “the best book on earth.”

Well, I’m taking the challenge, and I invite you to read it with me.  I’ll be sharing my thoughts on the book here, and I would love to hear your thoughts on it, as well.  It’ll be like a virtual book club.  This particular book is broken into 40 main chapters meant to be read one day at a time to be pondered, digested, and reflected upon before moving on to the next chapter, so that’s how I’m going to post about.

Before we get started, I feel the need to preface this first post by letting you know that this book is written by a Christian, for Christians.  That’s an fyi observation, not a judgment, and is not to suggest that those who do not identify as Christian shouldn’t read the book.  I do not identify as Christian, but I’m reading the book.  Rather, it’s to prepare you for what you’re going to encounter when you do – personification of God, worshiping of Christ as a personified God, and bible verses out the wazoo.  For you non-Christian spiritualists, in place of “God” and “Christ” you might use “Being,” “Love,” “Light,” “Presence,” “God-self,” or “true Self” (somewhat akin to Freud’s concept of “super ego”); in place of “self,” you might use “ego,” or “false self.”  Atheists and others who believe in no power greater than their own rational mind are going to have a harder go of it.

If you cannot either accept or get past the Christian vocabulary and bible verses, if you cannot find a way to make references to God and Christ meaningful for you in your own terms, if you cannot consider the veracity of the words for distaste of the theology espoused by the author, then perhaps you should not read the book.  I’m not interested in carrying on arguments about whether God is real, whether religion is good or bad, whether the authors of the Gospels were even alive when Christ lived, etc.  That’s not what this is about.  This is about whether you (and I) find truth in the life lessons described in the book; whether we have experiential knowledge of the “truths” asserted by the author; whether we know the truth voiced therein not only in our minds, but in our hearts, where true knowledge resides.

Okay, on to The Purpose Driven Life

Warren begins his book with the assertion that “It all starts with God,” and “It’s not about me.”

This is why I said atheists and worshipers of the rational mind were going to have a hard time with the book.  To try to alleviate some of the mental block to the concept of God, I’m going to refer to It as Good.  Let’s dig in…

You know that Good (however you conceive of that concept) exists when you experience Good moving in your life first hand.  However, experiencing Good is a choice.  Let me say that again – whether or not you experience Good moving in your life is a choice you make on a moment by moment basis.  Before you can experience Good, you must first believe in the existence of Good.  Believing in Good, you must look for Good’s guidance in your life.  Having felt Good’s guidance (yes, felt, as in “in your body”), you must follow that guidance in faith.  Having followed Good’s guidance, you can reflect on your decision to do so (it’s a choice, remember?) and see the good It has wrought in your life.

A couple points of clarification:

First, what does it mean to “feel” Good’s guidance?  It’s actually pretty simple and we each feel it every day, but we may not realize it because we identify the feeling as our selves, not as Good (which is really fine since your truest Self is Good – what else could it be, after all?).  An example is when someone asks you a question that you don’t want to answer honestly because you’re afraid of the reaction you’ll get – Did you like my presentation?  Are you coming home for Thanksgiving?  Where were you last night?  You have two choices:  you can be honest or you can lie.  In the fraction of a second it takes you to weigh your two options, how does each one feel?  The thought of telling the truth evokes a feeling of relief, but may be accompanied by a fear of the future – how is the other person going to react?  Will they hurt me in some way?  The thought of lying brings a feeling of discomfort, perhaps even nausea, but we may think we’ll avoid future conflict and discomfort by swallowing our discomfort in the present moment.  Notice that what moves us to lie instead of tell the truth is a focus on a future that exists only in our mind rather than on the present moment, recalling Eckhart Tolle’s words on the importance of living in the present moment.  The relief we feel when we contemplate telling the truth is Good.  The unease we feel when we contemplate lying is not Good.  That’s a simple example, but that’s how it works.  Take any situation in your life that’s causing you difficulty or pain and bring it to Good for guidance – the guidance will be there.  You may have to be patient and listen for a long time to feel it, especially if you are in the habit of ignoring your internal guidance system, but the guidance will come when you are ready to receive it.  There’s a reason most American Christian denominations talk about having a “personal relationship” with Christ – in these religions, baptism literally brings the Holy Spirit into the body, into one’s heart, where you can access Christ’s guidance by feeling it any time you need to.  It is my personal belief that Good resides in all of us all the time – you don’t need to be a Christian and be baptized in order to access that guidance.  That’s what “ask and you shall receive” is all about – ask for Good’s guidance, get Good’s guidance.  Whether you choose to follow that guidance is another story entirely.  Which brings me to point 2…

If allowing Good to guide your life is so great, how come everyone doesn’t choose this path?  The short answer is because it’s scary.  Because allowing Good to guide your life means not allowing your mind to guide your life.  It means entrusting your life to a force that can’t be seen, touched, tasted, smelled, heard or even fully conceived of and understood by the human mind – it can only be felt.  Which of you would like to volunteer to let your heart take the driver’s seat for a while while your mind enjoys the view from the backseat?

It’s also painful, at least in the beginning.  Entrusting your life to Good’s guidance means leaving behind what is not Good in you, and this hurts.  In my example about lying, if we are honest with someone with the expectation that they will value our honesty and appreciate us more for it, but they attack or abandon us instead, that hurts.  It may hurt so much that we retreat from Good and go back to lying to spare ourselves future pain.  Or, we may recognize that that pain is merely the ego crying out in anguish over having not gotten its way and begin to relinquish our desire to use our words, whether lies or truths, to control others.  Entrusting your life to Good’s guidance means embarking on a journey of spiritual growth, and the price of growth is pain.  Khalil Gibran described it this way in The Prophet:

When love beckons to you, follow him, though his ways are hard and steep…  Even as he is for your growth, so is he for your pruning…  Like sheaves of corn he gathers you unto himself.  He threshes you to make you naked.  He sifts you to free you from your husks.  He grinds you to whiteness.  He kneads you until you are pliant; and then he assigns you to his sacred fire, that you may become sacred bread for God’s sacred feast…  But if in your fear you would seek only love’s peace and love’s pleasure, then it is better for you that you cover your nakedness and pass out of love’s threshing-floor, into the seasonless world where you shall laugh, but not all of your laughter, and weep, but not all of your tears.

My first real experience of Good came when I was 30 years old.  That’s when I first chose to experience Good in my life.  I was married and I was miserable.  I also felt stuck.  It was the summer of 2008, the economy was tanking quickly, and I had just graduated with my MBA and hadn’t yet found a job.  I knew I no longer wanted to be in my marriage, but I didn’t know how to get out – staying for economic security felt awful and unfair to him, yet I didn’t feel I could leave until I was able to support myself.  I found myself in a chicken-or-egg scenario and my mind went round and round – do I stay until I can find a job, or is my choosing to stay in an unhappy marriage what’s holding me back from finding employment?  I struggled for months, my mind not knowing what to do.

Good’s guidance came in the form of the Serenity Prayer:

Good, grant me the serenity to accept the things I cannot change, the courage to change the things I can, and the wisdom to know the difference.

I had my answer.  I couldn’t change the economy, I couldn’t change my employment situation, and I couldn’t change my marriage, but I could leave.  I didn’t have a lot of money, and I didn’t know how I was going to survive, but that didn’t matter – I had accepted what I couldn’t change and was going to change what I could.  The rest would work itself out, of this I was sure.

So, in October, one month after the market crashed and a couple of the big investment banks had gone belly up, I left.  I was talking on the phone with a friend, crying, despondent, and she asked why I didn’t leave.  I replied “where would I go?”  She told me to come to her place, so I did.  I never looked back.  My friends were incredibly generous and took wonderful care of me, a debt I hope to pay forward some day.  Within 2 months I had a job, an apartment, and a car.  More importantly, I now had experiential knowledge of Good.

Are you still bristling at the idea of placing some remote, unknown, unseen deity above yourself?  I get it, and this is where I think the Abrahamic religions do a disservice to spiritual seekers – personifying Good and making it an entity separate from human beings.  It’s difficult to appreciate Good when you’re made to feel fundamentally defiled and unworthy of Goodness.  Who wants to sacrifice their own will in the service of a distant, judgmental deity?  Not me.

But, that’s not what Good is about.  Good is about healing the internal divide between our false self/egoic mind and our true Self to become fulfilled.  Everything we do, every choice we make, either deepens our internal divide or heals it.  This is what sin is about – deepening our internal divide.  Sin is not about “badness,” it is not about judgment, shame or guilt.  Sin is about following the guidance of your false self instead of that of your true Self.  Buddhists say that attachment, or desire, is the source of all suffering, and I think the Christian equivalent to that is sin – we suffer when we sin, when we go against our true Selves, when we seek fulfillment – or numbing – of spiritual needs in worldly things (even unconsciously, which is how most of us live, in my observation).

Good is about leaving behind the ego’s will (sin) – the agenda that says you’ll be good enough or happy when…you lose weight, get the job, get the promotion, get the new X you’ve had your eye on, get that boob job, get married, have kids, buy a big house in the suburbs… – in favor of your true Self’s will.  Pursuing the ego’s agenda (sin) never leads to fulfillment.  Anticipation of getting what your ego wants is always more satisfying than actually getting it.  Fulfillment comes from pursuing your Soul’s agenda.  That’s what Good is about.

Truth?  I look forward to your comments 🙂

TL;DR:  No tl;dr for virtual book club posts.

Lessons and More Lessons

[Updated 7/4 with borrowed photos, links, and minor update to description of Rio Scenarium]

I started Portuguese lessons this week at Casa dos Caminhos language school in Ipanema.  The school’s history is quite interesting – it was started by a Dutch guy, who was working at an orphanage near Rio, to teach foreign volunteers how to speak the local language.  The original orphanage shut down, but the language school still serves as a means of financing charitable activities to serve poor and at-risk youth and teens.  Local children are brought to the school in the afternoons for tutoring and such, and there’s a project in a rural area a few hours away in which volunteers are given room and board (probably funded by the school) in exchange for their help in building eco-friendly housing.  I have a lot of admiration for the guys who run the place, and I find the story of the school and the organization inspiring.

Caminhos
Casa dos Caminhos in Ipanema (Not my photo – found this on the Caminhos FaceBook page)

I was a little late to start the lessons, so I had a private lesson on Tuesday afternoon to catch me up and started with the rest of the group on Wednesday.  There are two other Americans in the class – one from LA and one from Phoenix.  There are 3 Brits – one who’s married to a Brazilian woman and the other two are a couple who just graduated college (actually, this was their only week of class, so we won’t be seeing them again) – one Japanese woman who happened to study English at UCSD and who is married to a Brazilian man, one Romanian woman who’s got a Belgian boyfriend here with her, and a Latvian guy.  It’s quite the diverse group!

The teacher speaks Portuguese almost exclusively in the class, which is great because I’m constantly getting to hear what the language sounds like and match it up to the words that are being spoken.  I’ve actually started to be able to pick words out of the jumble of sounds I hear coming out of people’s mouths.  I don’t know anything about how the Portuguese pronounce their words, but the Brazilian pronunciation is totally foreign to American ears and sounds nothing like the written word would suggest to American eyes that it should.  For example, “gente” is pronounced “ZHEN-tchee” and “til” is pronounced “tcheeyou” and “nos” is pronounced “noeesh.”  It takes some getting used to.

The school also has various activities in the afternoons the students can participate in, like Samba lessons, movie nights, beach volleyball, etc.  Friday nights are caipirinha nights – first caipirinha is free.  They basically set up benches, chairs, and a bar outside on the sidewalk and throw a party for the staff and students.  Lots of folks showed up, and I made some new acquaintances among the other students and the volunteers working at the building site who had come in to town for the weekend (mostly Dutch and British guys).  It was very well done and I really enjoyed it.

Everyone was planning on going to Lapa last night, it seemed.  Lapa (which is where I’m staying) is located downtown and is a center for night life in Rio de Janeiro.  As an acquaintance who used to live in Rio told me, Copacabana and Ipanema have the ritzy club scene for the tourists and wealthier Brazilians, other areas of downtown have a grittier club scene that serves mainly lower income Brazilians, but Lapa is the place where everyone comes together to mix and mingle.  It certainly had a very authentic vibe.  Ground zero is the Lapa Arches, where all kinds of vendors set up selling caiprinhas, beer and food and where people generally go to hang out and be loud.  The rest of the action is in the bars on the west side of the Arches, and the place is hoppin’.  There were thousands of people out in the streets (though fewer than usual, I was told) and there was a real party atmosphere.

This is about what it looked like last night. The other side of the Arches has all the crowded bars. (Not my photo)

I was curious what everyone was going there for – for a particular reason or just to look around or what? – and arranged to meet up with some folks later in the evening.  I was down at the Arches looking for them when I stumbled across one of my classmates – the Romanian girl and her Belgian boyfriend.  Just a few minutes later, the British couple came passing by, and suddenly we had a little group. After hanging out at the Arches for a bit, we decided to go to Rio Scenarium, a very popular club just a few blocks away.

Pic of inside of Rio Scenarium. This is taken from the 3rd floor – you can see the 2nd and 3rd floors have cut outs above the 1st floor dance floor and stage where the live music is. (Not my photo)

Rio Scenarium is a serious nightclub and popular among both Brazilians (at least the ones who can afford it) and foreign tourists – I’d guess the mix was about 30 foreign/70 Brazilian on Friday night.  The place is beautiful – it sits in a historic building that is kept in beautiful condition with what looks like original wood flooring and banisters, historic interior design and antique decor.  It has 3 floors with live traditional music (Samba, Bossa Nova, etc.) in the main area and at least one separate area with more modern dj’ed music.  When you go in, you have to give them your ID, which they enter into their computer system, and then they take your picture before giving you a “ticket” – it looks kind of like a long, skinny menu, but it’s what you hand to the bartenders whenever you order a drink.  They enter your order into the system, mark it on your ticket, and you pay for everything at the end of the night before you leave.  If you lose your ticket, apparently the fee is quite high.

I was kind of looking forward to checking out Rio Scenarium because I understood it to be a place where people actually dance actual Brazilian dances on the dance floor, but that’s not what it was.  It was a nightclub, replete with drunk and obnoxious bachelorette party and all.  I forgot how much I dislike nightclubs, and feeling like a 5th wheel didn’t help.  I find nightclubs to be very lonely places, at least as a single person.  You might find some company, but you’re not going to find connection.  People are either not interested in you at all or they’re interested in you for the wrong reasons – as an object, a tool for satisfying their own worldly desires, whether that’s getting attention, drinks, money, sex, whatever.

I write colloquially about the collective “you,” but please don’t imagine I intend to speak on your behalf.  This is my experience, and perhaps that experience is unique to me.  I expect ill will from the people I meet in bars, and I find it.  Perhaps my own negative bias attracts that kind of energy.

At any rate, I stayed at Rio Scenarium just long enough to realize I wasn’t having a good time.  Fortunately, it was only a few minutes walk back to the apartment.

I also started taking dance lessons this week.  Renata Peçanha is a zouk and Brazilian ballroom (Samba, Bolero, Soltinho) dancer and dance instructor here in Rio who was recommended to me by the fabulous Shani Mayer in Los Angeles.  We had a private zouk lesson on Tuesday morning.  I haven’t danced Zouk in over a year, so it was a fantastic refresher to get me back into it.  And Renata speaks English, which is great.  I also had group lessons with Renata on Thursday night – a Zouk lesson and my first lessons in Samba, Bolero and Soltinho.  Samba and Bolero are quite similar, though Samba is danced with smaller steps and to faster music, as far as I can tell.  I found it interesting that Samba, Bolero and Zouk all have the same basic step in form, though the execution and feel are very different.  The basic step for all these dances is two 1-count steps followed by a 2-count step, or quick-quick-slow.  Soltinho is actually related to swing dancing, with a step-step-triple step base, kind of like a Brazilian Swing dance.  All the students were super friendly, encouraging, and eager to help me learn the dances.

After the lessons on Thursday, I went to Lindy na Lapa – Lindy in Lapa, the local Lindy Hop dance event in Rio.  The club is just around the corner from my apartment, which made it very convenient.  The group was small – maybe a dozen dancers in total – which wasn’t surprising, but it put a smile on my face to see Brazilians dancing and enjoying Lindy Hop (and even Balboa!) here in Rio.  I was surprised to find another American there – a guy from Texas – and another man from Italy.  I guess it didn’t occur to me there might be other foreigners looking to get their Lindy fix while in Rio.

I have been really lax about my spiritual practices this last week.  Almost no meditating (and a strange determination to avoid doing so by any means necessary) and very little present-moment focus.  Between language lessons, travel to and from school, dance lessons, food shopping (grocery store shopping is a serious ordeal here, which I will try to describe in a later post), cooking, writing, and whatever else I may have going on, I have felt pressed for time and have not prioritized my spiritual health.  Even when I do have time, I manage to find all kinds of distractions to keep me occupied, and my mind is chaotic and all over the place when I do practice.  I’ve allowed myself to get pulled in too many directions and it’s taking its toll.  Time to refocus and scale it back to what’s important.

TL;DR:  Language lessons.  Dance lessons.  Life lessons.

The Little Things

The last few days have been very of-this-world.  I’ve spent them establishing something like a life for my time here in Rio and running to appointments.  It’s a new challenge – it being a foreign country and me not speaking the language and all – and it’s been fun, if trying at times.  It’s also a complete reversal from my last few days in the States, as I wrote about here and here, in which I spent a great deal of time alone focusing on my internal world.

A huge part of this experience is trying to blend in; faking being a brazileira until I no longer have to fake it, I’ll just be one (though that would take a lot longer than the measly few weeks I’ve allotted to the cause).  This includes always looking like I know where I’m going, moving with a purpose, and trying to adopt the same detached attitude all the locals seem to have to their surroundings.

This detached attitude is not unique to Rio – it’s a common factor you find in large cities the world over, in my experience.  It’s a normal response to the stimulus overload you get in cities – the crush of people all around you, the noise, the smells, the activity, the signs, the traffic, the vendors and panhandlers trying to separate you from your money…The bigger the city, and the higher the population density, the greater the overwhelming sensory input from too many disparate sources and the more we feel the need to detach.

A detached attitude has its appeal.  It says “I know this place so well, I don’t need to pay attention to what’s going on.  I’m in control.”  This unconscious thought is accompanied by at least the appearance of a distinct lack of worry – I don’t need to pay attention because nothing bad is going to happen.  You see this everywhere in Rio, among all kinds of people – risky road crossings, crazy driving, and paying little attention to personal belongings.  The detached attitude also bespeaks confidence, which humans value so highly in one another.

The nothing-bad-is-going-to-happen aspect of the Rio attitude appeals to me very much because people always tell you how you have to be careful in Rio, always watch your things, etc., and yet I haven’t seen anything to suggest I’m unsafe or felt I was being targeted for a crime.  On the contrary, the people here all seem to be a combination of busy with their own lives and not even remotely interested in this estrangeiro with incomprehensible Portuguese and a look of total confusion on their face, and/or plainly honest without even the thought, let alone desire, that they might take advantage of you.  Despite their seeming detached attitude, they do go out of their way to help strangers when they see the need.  And I haven’t seen one crazy driver hit one crazy pedestrian yet, despite the ample opportunity for such unfortunate occurrences.  There’s an empathy and even a tenderness for each other underlying the seeming detachment.  The cariocas (natives of Rio) seem to draw their sense of no-worry not from confidence in their own separate goodness, rightness, strength or invincibility, as you see in so many American cities, but from a sense of connectedness – they trust that nothing is going to happen, but if it does, a carioca has hundreds of friends on hand to help them out.  A detached attitude may not be unique to Rio, but this underlying sense of connectedness is.  It’s this lack of connectedness in conjunction with our detached attitudes that makes others seem so cold and ourselves feel so alone in American cities.

Well, I kind of lost track of that connectedness.  I got so consumed with all the things I felt I needed to do that I haven’t been making time to meditate or read – to just be.  I haven’t been connecting with my inner self, and it was in this state of “sleep” that I went walking around Rio this afternoon trying to replicate the detached attitude of those around me.  One of the ways that detachment manifests is in moving around with little apparent concern or regard for others.  This includes the crazy driving, the crazy street crossings, and walking around briskly like you’re entitled to the space you’re in and the space you’re moving into regardless the people around you.  So, that was me, walking around briskly with little regard for those around me and assuming nothing bad was going to happen.

At one extremely busy intersection in downtown, when the pedestrian light turned green, the crosswalk was full of stopped cars.  The crush of people trying to cross the street – in both directions – was navigating the very narrow spaces between the cars.  Trying to be a brasileira, I bounded into the craziness as well, taking care not to be careless about the other people, but asserting my right of way as I saw everyone else doing.  Suddenly, I felt my shirt being pulled in the opposite direction.  It had gotten caught on the backpack zipper of someone crossing the other way.  We were both walking quickly, so my shirt was stretched pretty far by the time we both stopped just long enough to decouple ourselves.   When I looked down to check out the damage, there was a dime-sized hole in my shirt.

Instant anger.  It flared up before I even knew what was happening.  Thoughts that ran through my head:  “I only have two black tank tops, and now this one’s ruined.”  “I really don’t want to have to spend the money I have on new clothes.”  “This kind of thing isn’t supposed to happen!”  And there was no one to blame.  It wasn’t her fault.  She was just crossing the street like everyone else; she didn’t mean to catch my shirt on her backpack.  At most, I could say she was being careless.  But, if she was being careless, then so was I.

I guess that was when I realized I’d been walking around in a bit of a mindless trance.  I’d gotten so absorbed in the external world and trying to fake being a brasileira that I lost touch with my inner Being.

The little things really do matter, and the devil really is in the details.  Simply staying connected to myself might have prevented the collision in the first place (I didn’t really want to enter that mess, I only did it because everyone else was doing it and when in Rome and all that) or at least helped me to observe my anger as it rose instead of allowing it to take me over, however briefly.

With the benefit of reflection, I can be grateful for the relatively gentle reminder that it’s what’s inside – truly little things – that matters, not the external world of fear and loss.

TL;DR:  Lost myself in the external world of illusion, got a gentle nudge from the universe to snap out of it.

Lazy Morning, Lovely Afternoon

Friends, I have confession to share with you.  There’s something in my life – an aspect of my personality – I’ve been resisting for quite a long time.  Something I haven’t fully accepted the “is-ness” of, something I continue to fight against and judge myself for.  Today, though, reality finally seeped in through the cracks in my defenses and I just couldn’t deny it any longer.  I finally accepted that…

I am not a morning person.  I’m not!  I’m just not.  I want to be, or at least I say I want to be, and I berate myself for not having more get-up-and-go when I wake up, like I’m wasting my life or something.  I love those days when I wake up and hop out of bed like a 5-year old on Christmas morning, but those days are rare indeed.  As I lay in bed until the late hours of the morning this morning, I was finally moved to accept that I am not a morning person.  Maybe one day I will be, and  I’ll greet every morning with a whistle on my lips and a song in my heart…

But I wouldn’t put money on it.

Once I finally got moving today, I hopped a bus to Ipanema (Brazillians pronounce it more like “ee-PAH-neh-muh” than the Americanized “ee-puh-NEE-muh”).  I was going to take the metro, but I came across a bus heading that direction just a few steps outside my building and decided to take that instead.  Taking the bus is such a great way to see the city, and really fun.  The buses here are safe, and no one pays you any mind.  You couldn’t pay me to take public transit in LA by myself, but here – it’s fantastic.  The only potential problem with the buses is not knowing the route they follow or how long it’s going to take.  I guess you figure that out with time.  I was trying to go to Copacabana, and the bus I hopped on went there, but not directly – it went west out to the Botanical Garden and slightly west of Leblon before coming back east toward Copacabana, and the traffic was a nightmare.  I ended up getting off in Ipanema instead of going all the way to Copacabana, and I was on that bus for at least an hour, probably 3 times as long as the metro would have taken.

I was headed to Copacabana for two reasons, the first being to find a chiropractor.  I started having a lot of back pain yesterday and I wanted to nip it in the bud, so I went looking for a chiropractor and an acupuncturist.  The closest chiros or acupuncturists I could find via Google were in Copacabana, but since the bus I was on went though Ipanema first, where there was also a chiropractor, I decided to just get off there.  The chiropractor was a lovely woman who, fortunately for me, spoke English.  She and the acupuncturist fixed me up pretty good, but I’m still taking meds when the pain flairs up.  I’m going to lay off the working out for a bit until it’s back to normal.

The other reason I was headed to the area was to enroll in Portuguese lessons.  And I did!  I found one school online that particularly appealed to me, so I went there and signed up.  Would that I had thought of this sooner, but that’s kind of how it goes when you take life by the seat of your pants.  Group classes start every Monday, so I missed today, and I’ve arranged a private dance lesson tomorrow morning, so I’ll miss tomorrow, too, but I scheduled a private lesson tomorrow afternoon to catch myself up.  I’ll start group lessons on Wednesday – 3 hours each weekday morning this week and next.  I have to be at the school in Ipanema in time for 9am class, so I guess I’m going to become a morning person whether I want to or not!

On another serendipitous note, I just found out there’s Lindy Hop in Rio.  And the weekly dance is held at a club literally around the corner from where I’m staying.  I am loving this trip.

TL;DR:  Minor epiphany followed by glorious day of new adventures.